🩸 Common Law — Part IX: Blood, Sacrifice, and the True Cost of Freedom

Why Some Rights Were Bought With Blood



🔔 The Question No One Wants to Ask

This article is part of a structured series based on the work of John Quade. Each installment builds on the previous one. If you’re new here, I strongly recommend starting with the Series Introduction, which explains the purpose, scope, and proper way to read this work.

John Quade ends where modern culture is most uncomfortable:

Is liberty worth dying for?

Not rhetorically.
Not emotionally.

Historically.

Because if the answer is no, then the rest of the conversation — rights, property, contracts, churches, constitutions — becomes academic.

Freedom has always had a cost.
The only question is who pays it.


📜 Freedom Was Never Free

Quade reminds us that American Freedom did not emerge from paperwork.

It emerged from:

  • Men who stood
  • Families who lost fathers
  • Communities who buried their dead

Freedom was not declared into existence.

It was defended into existence.


🏛️ Lexington Was Not an Accident

History often reduces Lexington and Concord to a political dispute.

Quade insists it was theological and legal.

The men who stood on Lexington Green:

  • Did not fire first
  • Did not flee
  • Did not negotiate

They stood.

Why?

Because under the Christian doctrine they held, defensive resistance required bloodshed first.

They understood the cost.


Faith and Law Were Not Separate

Quade rejects the modern notion that faith and law were ever divorced.

For the early Americans:

  • God was the source of law
  • Law was the boundary of power
  • Freedom flowed from obedience to higher authority

This is why pastors mattered.

This is why churches mattered.

This is why scripture mattered.


🧠 Responsibility Precedes Rights

One of Quade’s most sobering assertions is this:

A people incapable of self-governance cannot sustain freedom.

Rights require discipline.

Freedom requires restraint.

Without moral boundaries, freedom becomes chaos — and chaos invites control.


🔄 How Freedom Is Lost

Quade argues Freedom is not usually taken by tyrants.

It is surrendered by citizens.

Not all at once.

But gradually:

  • Convenience over conscience
  • Comfort over responsibility
  • Permission over authority

The price is delayed.

But it always comes due.


🧱 The Burden of Inheritance

Freedom is not owned.

It is inherited.

And inheritances can be squandered.

Quade places responsibility not on institutions, but on individuals:

To whom much is given, much is required.

The blood of the past does not guarantee the freedom of the future.


🩸 Why Blood Still Matters

Blood represents final commitment.

It marks the line beyond which compromise ends.

Quade does not call for violence.

He calls for honesty:

If you will not suffer for freedom, you will eventually suffer without it.


🧭 What Remains

Quade offers no policy.

No program.

No party.

Only a mirror.

Freedom survives only where men and women are willing to govern themselves — and accept the consequences.


📜 A Closing Charge

The question remains open:

Will freedom be preserved as an inheritance?

Or remembered as a story?

The answer does not belong to history.

It belongs to the present.


🔚 Closing Clause — Transition to Part X

Before this series can move forward, one final structural hinge must be addressed.

The relationship between church, jurisdiction, and tax exemption did not collapse on its own. It was legally reorganized — quietly, incrementally, and with lasting consequences.

That reorganization finds its clearest expression in a single constitutional mechanism that most people reference, debate, or fear, but rarely examine structurally:

The 14th Amendment.

In the next article, Part X — The 14th Amendment Pivot, we will step away from emotion, blame, and modern political framing, and instead look at the amendment for what it functionally represents:

  • a jurisdictional redirection
  • a redefinition of standing
  • and a shift from one lane of governance to another

Not as an accusation.
Not as a grievance.

But as a pivot point.

Understanding this pivot is essential — not to fight the system, but to understand where one is standing, and why certain rules apply in one jurisdiction and not in another.

Only then does choice become possible.

— Next and final is: Part X — The 14th Amendment Pivot


🔔 Call to Action

Clarity changes perspective.
Correction changes standing.

Until records are corrected, silence is treated as consent.

👉 Learn how to correct the record lawfully
🔗 https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/correct-your-status/


American National Way is shared freely for the benefit of all; your support and sharing it with family and friends is sincerely appreciated!

Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice




One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Your donations help keep this site running and growing; your support is truly appreciated, thank you!

Your donations help keep this site running and growing; your support is truly appreciated, thank you!

Your donations help keep this site running and growing; your support is truly appreciated, thank you!

Choose an amount

$8.00
$15.00
$20.00
$8.00
$15.00
$20.00
$80.00
$150.00
$200.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly